Uma centena de pessoas arrependidas por terem "mudado" de sexo

 

A compilation of remarks about crime eulogy, "woke" ideology, handicapped leftists, submission to Islam and other mental illnesses (10)

 

Arresting black murders, black rapists and so on, it's racist!

 

Leftist woke thinks pedophiles deserve dignity

 

𝗨𝗥𝗚𝗘𝗡𝗧 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘 𝗥𝗘𝗩𝗜𝗘𝗪: 𝗧𝗘𝗘𝗡 𝗥𝗔𝗣𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗦 𝗪𝗔𝗟𝗞 𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘

 

The UK government's Attorney General is officially reviewing the highly controversial sentences handed to three teenage boys who avoided jail time after being convicted of raping two girls.

The decision sparked massive public outcry, with critics calling the non-custodial sentences a "disgrace."

 

Here is everything you need to know about the case and what happens next:

𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗔𝗧𝗧𝗔𝗖𝗞𝗦 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗩𝗜𝗖𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡

 

Five-week trial at Southampton Crown Court.

Three boys, aged 13 and 14 at the time, convicted of 11 rape charges and multiple counts of making indecent images.

Attacks took place between 2024 and 2025 in Fordingbridge, Hampshire.

One victim was held at knifepoint.

The boys filmed the assaults on phones, laughed, and shared the footage online.

 

𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗖𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗥𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗦𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗦𝗘𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗡𝗖𝗘𝗦

 

Judge Nicholas Rowland chose not to send the teenagers to a young offender institution, opting for youth rehabilitation orders instead:

Boy A (now 15): 3-year rehabilitation order + 10-year restraining order.

Boy B (now 15): 3-year rehabilitation order + 10-year restraining order.

Boy C (now 14): 18-month rehabilitation order + 10-year restraining order.

The judge stated the court should focus on supporting the children's reintegration into society.

 

𝗧𝗛𝗘 𝗣𝗨𝗕𝗟𝗜𝗖 𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗣𝗢𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗟 𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗖𝗥𝗬

 

The Attorney General, Lord Hermer, stepped in under the Unduly Lenient Sentence (ULS) scheme following intense public backlash:

Jess Phillips MP condemned the decision, warning it sends a "bad message" to victims who face gruelling trials.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) detailed the horrific, planned nature of the separate attacks.

High-profile figures and the public are demanding immediate judicial intervention.

 

𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗛𝗔𝗣𝗣𝗘𝗡𝗦 𝗡𝗘𝗫𝗧?

 

The Attorney General’s office has 28 days from the sentencing date to review the case details.

If the punishment is found to be significantly out of line with the crime, it will be referred to the Court of Appeal.

Three senior judges will then decide whether to overturn the orders and hand down tough custodial sentences.

 

𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗪𝗘 𝗦𝗛𝗢𝗨𝗟𝗗 𝗕𝗘 𝗔𝗦𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚 

 

Questions for the Government (Ministry of Justice & Attorney General)

Sentencing Guidelines: Will the government review the sentencing guidelines for youth offenders convicted of grave crimes like rape to ensure custodial options are prioritized?

Unduly Lenient Sentence (ULS) Scheme: What precise metrics will the Attorney General use to determine if these specific rehabilitation orders cross the threshold of being "unduly lenient"?

Deterrence Message: How does the government plan to counteract the public perception that non-custodial sentences for filmed, multi-count rapes weaken the legal system's deterrence?

Judicial Discretion Limits: Is Parliament considering legislation to limit judicial discretion when youth offenses involve lethal weapons, such as knives, or organized digital sharing?

Questions for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS)

Impact of Digital Sharing: How heavily did the CPS emphasize the ongoing, permanent harm of the online footage distribution during their sentencing arguments?

Victim Safeguarding: What specific recommendations did the CPS present to the court to protect the victims from further online or physical harassment during the boys' rehabilitation?

Appeal Advocacy: Will the CPS actively submit formal evidence to support the Attorney General’s referral of this case to the Court of Appeal?

Charge Severity: Did the CPS pursue all available charges related to the digital distribution of the assault footage to ensure the full scope of criminality was acknowledged?

Tower Hamlets Council meeting: speaking about Bangladesh politics...

 

𝐂𝐀𝐈𝐑 𝐈𝐒 𝐑𝐄𝐂𝐑𝐔𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐀 𝐆𝐄𝐍𝐄𝐑𝐀𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐅 𝐌𝐔𝐒𝐋𝐈𝐌 ‘𝐂𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄 𝐌𝐀𝐊𝐄𝐑𝐒’ 𝐓𝐎 𝐖𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐎𝐔𝐒𝐀𝐍𝐃𝐒 𝐎𝐅 𝐀𝐌𝐄𝐑𝐈𝐂𝐀𝐍 𝐎𝐅𝐅𝐈𝐂𝐄𝐒

 

“𝘞𝘩𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘸𝘢𝘯𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘭𝘦𝘢𝘥𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘵𝘺, 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘴𝘰𝘳𝘵 𝘰𝘧 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘯𝘨𝘦 𝘮𝘢𝘬𝘦𝘳 — 𝘢𝘱𝘱𝘭𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘸𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘣𝘦 𝘢 𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺 𝘨𝘰𝘰𝘥 𝘸𝘢𝘺.” — 𝘊𝘈𝘐𝘙’𝘴 𝘳𝘦𝘤𝘳𝘶𝘪𝘵𝘮𝘦𝘯𝘵 𝘱𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩

 

An open plan, much of it stated in their own words:

— The program: CAIR runs 𝐚 ‘𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐥𝐢𝐦𝐬 𝐕𝐨𝐭𝐞’ 𝐝𝐫𝐢𝐯𝐞 to mobilize two million voters, train Muslim candidates, and tally their wins in a report titled “Rise of the Change Makers.”

— The ambition: CAIR’s longtime chief Nihad Awad has spoken of building 𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐬 of Muslim professionals and seating “40 to 50 members of Congress.”

— The label: Texas and Florida have branded CAIR a 𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐝-𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐤𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐫 𝐠𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐩 — a designation CAIR denies and is fighting in court.

— The irony: the Muslim Brotherhood is 𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐥𝐚𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐚𝐬 𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐫𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐄𝐠𝐲𝐩𝐭, 𝐒𝐚𝐮𝐝𝐢 𝐀𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐚, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐀𝐄 — yet a US group accused of its ties organizes and recruits freely here.

Recruiting young people into public life isn’t the problem — that is how a republic works. 

 

The question is who is doing the recruiting, and to what end. A group two US states have branded a Brotherhood-linked terror organization is openly running candidate pipelines and talking about dozens of seats in Congress — and we are told it is bigoted to notice. Cairo and Abu Dhabi aren’t worried about Islamophobia. They outlawed the Brotherhood because they fear it. Maybe ask why.

𝐂𝐚𝐢𝐫𝐨 𝐛𝐚𝐧𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐁𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐡𝐨𝐨𝐝. 𝐖𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐭𝐨𝐧 𝐥𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐭 𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐞.

 

Details of the Muslim invasion