domingo, 30 de agosto de 2026

A Muslim man tried to groom a 14-year-old online to look for sex, but a group of British patriots caught him and delivered him to the police


 

Quanto mais masculina é a imigração, mais difícil é a integração (o que é visível no aumento do número de violações...)


 

If you support immigration, take a family of Afghan to your home and see how they fit with your LGBT lifestyle


 

A message from a man that faced one of the worst dictator of all times: Salman Rushdie


 

Isaltino de Morais dá casa a imigrantes indostânicos


 

Imigrates ilegais recebem panfletos, em UK relações sexuais sem consentimento são violação, são crime


 

António Guterres: muitos relatores da ONU "estão fora de controle"


 

A story from a white liberal woke woman, told by dr. Gad Saad


 More details about the same story

The narrative described refers to human rights activist Amanda Kijera, who published an essay detailing her experience following the devastating 2010 Haiti earthquake.

The Context of Her Journey

Amanda Kijera, an American human rights worker, traveled to Haiti shortly after the January 2010 earthquake. She went with the intention of doing aid work and actively sought to challenge and disprove international media reports claiming that Haitian men were systematically brutalizing and raping women in the displaced persons camps. She believed these reports were being exaggerated or weaponized by mainstream outlets to unfairly demonize Black men.

The Incident

While in Haiti, Kijera was cornered on a rooftop and brutally gang-raped by a group of men, including individuals she had been advocating for and assisting.

Her Response and "White Privilege"

Following the attack, Kijera wrote a widely discussed editorial titled “We are not your weapons – we are women,” published in April 2010. In the essay, she did not excuse the rape itself, but she contextualized the actions of her attackers through the lens of global racial hierarchies, colonialism, and white privilege.


Key arguments and points she made included:

    Validating Global Anger: Kijera wrote that Black men have a legitimate right to feel rage regarding their historically oppressed position in the global white-dominated socioeconomic hierarchy.

    Misdirected Rage: She argued that while their anger against systemic oppression and colonialism is justified, it is deeply misdirected when it manifests as sexual violence against women.

    The Burden on Women of Color: She highlighted that women, particularly women of color, are ultimately forced to bear the brunt of the trauma and rage experienced by disenfranchised men.

    Continued Solidarity: Despite the trauma, Kijera explicitly stated that she still viewed Haitian men as her "brothers" and refused to let her assault be used to validate racist stereotypes against Haitian people as a whole.

Aftermath and Debate

Kijera's essay sparked intense online and academic debate. Critics argued that her application of complex sociological theories (like post-colonial trauma and white privilege) served to minimize the personal accountability of the rapists. Conversely, supporters and intersectional feminists praised her for refusing to allow her personal tragedy to be co-opted into broader anti-Haitian or racist narratives, while still explicitly demanding that men stop using women's bodies as battlegrounds for their societal grievances.