Jovem punida na escola por usar bandeira inglesa

 

Multiculturalidade em Inglaterra

 

Gangues de africanos em Londres

 

Crianças muçulmanas treinadas para matar nos EUA

 

Cidades da UE com Maior Percentagem de Imigrantes (População Nascida no Estrangeiro/Não Nacional)

 

    Luxemburgo (Cidade), Luxemburgo:
        Sendo a capital de um país onde mais de metade da população é estrangeira, a cidade do Luxemburgo tem uma das maiores percentagens de residentes estrangeiros na Europa. A sua condição de centro financeiro e sede de instituições europeias atrai um vasto número de profissionais internacionais.

    Bruxelas, Bélgica:
        A capital da Bélgica e o centro administrativo da União Europeia, Bruxelas é extremamente diversa. Em 2023, a percentagem de migrantes (nascidos no estrangeiro) na população era de cerca de 47,9%. A presença de organizações internacionais, embaixadas e um mercado de trabalho dinâmico contribui para esta diversidade.

    Amesterdão, Países Baixos:
        Esta cidade vibrante e global tem uma alta percentagem de população nascida no estrangeiro. Em 2023, cerca de 37,1% da população de Amesterdão era de migrantes.

    Viena, Áustria:
        A capital austríaca também se destaca pela sua população internacional. Em 2023, aproximadamente 31,3% da população de Viena era nascida no estrangeiro.

    Cidades Alemãs (Frankfurt, Munique, Estugarda, Berlim):
        Várias grandes cidades alemãs têm uma percentagem significativa de migrantes, impulsionadas pela sua forte economia e procura de mão-de-obra qualificada e não qualificada.
            Frankfurt: Cerca de 29% da população era estrangeira em 2019.
            Munique: Cerca de 26% da população era estrangeira em 2019.
            Estugarda: Cerca de 25% da população era estrangeira em 2019.
            Berlim: Cerca de 21% da população era nascida no estrangeiro em 2021.
 

“No Community Without Borders”—Ordo Iuris Founder Jerzy Kwaśniewski

 

"(...) The entire machinery of mass migration exploits a natural human instinct: the desire to find a better life for oneself and one’s family. If Europe is presented as a promised land—where generous welfare awaits, where one need not work, where laws are lenient or not enforced, and where a general sense of impunity reigns—then it is only logical that people will be drawn to that image."

"But that is only the beginning.
For the operation to scale, permanent channels and logistical systems for smuggling must be established. These require an initial investment—financial, political, and institutional. Typically, such an investment comes from an interested party: an NGO, a foreign government, or some other actor intent on provoking migratory flows for strategic purposes.
This is not theory. It has been methodically analysed by scholars such as Professor Kelly Greenhill, who termed the phenomenon ”weapon of mass migration."

"One illustrative example would be the Russian aerial bombardments of Aleppo—explicitly designed to displace large populations and flood Europe with refugees. That was over a decade ago.
Another example is more recent: the financing of flights from the Middle East to Minsk or Moscow, from where state services of our eastern neighbours—Belarus and Russia—escort migrants to the Polish border to create yet another pressure point.
 Once that initial phase is complete, organised crime assumes control. That is, in fact, the very design of this weapon: a self-sustaining, self-replicating system intended to destabilise the target state."

"The moment the first migrants cross the border and successfully post selfies from Warsaw, Berlin, or Paris, the message is received loud and clear back home: the route is open.
Initially, these migrants rely on NGOs or states sponsoring the route. But almost immediately, intermediaries emerge—traffickers, smugglers—who profit from the now-proven success of the journey. Demand rises, and soon the entire mechanism is operating autonomously. Meanwhile, the second key to the weapon’s effectiveness is the compliance—or at least acquiescence—of the receiving country. To ensure that, resources are invested in NGOs operating domestically, shaping policy, lobbying governments, and establishing infrastructure for internal migrant movement.

"

(Continue) 

 

Practical Idealism : Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi plan to replace white people with mixed blood people

 

The race of the future is a theoretical composite race which will result from the ongoing racial admixture.

Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi in 1925 in Practical Idealism predicted: "The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today's races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals." Kalergi's statement has subsequently been utilized as a part of the white-supremacist Kalergi Plan conspiracy theory.

The same scenario had been envisaged, with rather less enthusiasm, by Madison Grant in his 1916 The Passing of the Great Race, calling for a eugenics program to prevent this development, and in a similar ideological context in Lothrop Stoddard's The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy in 1920. 

(Continue)

 

 

Outrage in Spain: Locals Clash With Migrant Gangs

 

Torre Pacheco, Aranda de Duero, Almería, Torrevieja. Four names that, in recent days, have been added to Spain’s map of public outrage. The spark ignited in the Murcian town of Torre Pacheco, where a 68-year-old man was brutally beaten in broad daylight by a group of Maghrebi immigrants, allegedly just “for fun.” The assault has triggered an explosion in a pressure cooker that has been simmering for years: illegal squatting, drug trafficking, threats, machetes, and crime entrenched with near-impunity in many Spanish neighborhoods.

For three consecutive nights, residents of Torre Pacheco have taken to the streets, fed up with being ignored by authorities. Groups of local youths mobilized to find those responsible for the attack, while gangs of illegal immigrants responded armed with knives, sticks, and machetes. The result: riots, police charges, burning trash containers, reciprocal assaults, and six arrests—five Spaniards and one of Maghrebi origin.

The security operation deployed by the Civil Guard and Local Police, reinforced by special units, has served more to shield migrant-heavy neighborhoods than to restore calm to a terrified population. The Government’s delegate in Murcia, Mariola Guevara, has insisted that “racist behavior” will not be tolerated, while failing to condemn the attack on the elderly man that started it all.

Local residents have responded to the Ministry of the Interior’s inaction with growing anger—while Interior Minister Fernando Grande-Marlaska has responded with his usual spin, deflecting blame instead of taking responsibility. On Monday, July 14, he blamed right-wing party VOX and “organized groups” for the unrest, accusing them of inciting hate. “It’s VOX’s fault and the fault of discourse like VOX’s,” he told Cadena SER, a well-known leftist radio station. Meanwhile, police unions continue to denounce a lack of resources.

Perhaps most striking is the unified effort by mainstream media and left-wing influencers to distort the facts and flip the story: racists attack immigrants because they are of a different colour. Nothing could be further from the truth, as has been explained time and again by the citizens themselves.

What exists is a feeling of disgust at the lack of respect, poor behaviour, and lack of integration of a large part of the Muslim population, especially Moroccans. Some sources suggest that Morocco may even be behind some of this tension as a strategy to generate chaos in Spain. It would not be the first time.

(Continue)