quinta-feira, 9 de abril de 2026
Islam: Extinguishing Freedom of Speech
JD Vance is right: freedom of speech in Europe is “in retreat”. It is being eroded from within. The deliberate campaign of attrition is coming from members of Islam, a recently imported segment of the population.
Islam forbids freedom of speech. It is that simple. No ifs. No buts. Consequently, it employs many ploys and strategies, including scams, to erode and destroy it. The UK population, lacking a First Amendment, and conditioned by decades of comfortable freedom unchallenged, have a poor grasp of the vital importance of freedom of speech. For the functioning of democracy, it is essential that all subjects be available for discussion. There cannot be a whole area that is off-limits. A second disadvantage is the widespread lack of knowledge of and interest in Islam and its rules.
No free speech in Austria
There is no free speech in Austria. Thus concludes Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff. In a private conversation she used, of Mohammed, the scientific term Pedophile. It was overheard, and she was charged with “denigrating an established religion”. Her conviction was upheld all the way to the highest European court.
The “Sensitivity” scam
Ever well practiced at putting on an act, the Islamic lobby adopt sad faces and claim their “sensitivities” are offended by portrayals of Muhammad. The unwary British, polite, helpful, and easily gulled, have bent over backwards to oblige, thereby curtailing their speech. The result? No jokes, no cartoons, no satire of anything Islamic, no demonstrations. In the UK, speech is no longer free.
The sensitivity claim is a pose. In Islamic law criticism of Mohammed or Islam carries the death penalty. Remember this is the ideology which severs heads, cuts off limbs, throws homosexuals off tall buildings, and stones people to death. So sensitive.
The “Hate” scam
The Islamic lobby uses accusations of “hate speech” as a tactic. This has also brought undeserved success. Any criticism of Islam is blackened as “hate” and made the subject of contrived whining. Unbelievably the UK has, at the prompting of the Islamic lobby, instituted the preposterous “non-crime hate incident”. Police time has been fatuously wasted monitoring social media and visiting in person those recorded — without trial — as guilty of a non-crime hate incident, which goes on their criminal record. What is surprising is quite how this self-evident attack on free speech has been allowed to happen, yet it has. Recently, in response to widespread objections its use has been discontinued, but it has not been abolished, nor have all the records been deleted.
The sour irony behind this contrived whining is its arrant hypocrisy. Islam, after all, has the standing instruction “between us and you enmity and hatred forever” (K60:4, part of Islamic law).
Incitement to crime, of course, does not qualify as freedom of speech. It is already a crime. If, however, there is a special category of “hate speech” (everlastingly extendable) then there is no freedom of speech.
The “Islamophobia” scam
Deliberately invented as a weapon, the artificial construct Islamophobia has been undeservedly influential. Parliamentarians have been pressed by the Islamic lobby to agree a definition. To their credit up to now they have not accepted any of the suggestions proffered, and rightly so. The stratagem, after all, is quite transparently a critic-stopper. Its bogus nature is exposed when it is applied to anything else. Is criticism of the Tory party to be stopped because it is Toryphobia? Or of Trump because it is Trumpophobia? And so on, just fill in the blanks. Alas the Labour Government have agreed a definition of Anti-Muslim hostility defined as including violence, harassment, prejudicial stereotyping, and are proposing a “Tsar” to oversee it. This is a retrograde step, leading to blasphemy law by the backdoor.
The Islamophobia construct is a hollow sham and deserves contempt. All these stratagems are fraudulent. They are simply silencing devices, designed to erode western laws and make them compliant with Sharia. Everyone who supports democratic values of Western freedoms should dismiss them roundly.
(Continue)
Michael Copeland
‘Monster of Cherbourg’ on trial for raping Frenchwoman Mégane into a month-long coma with broomstick
The suspect repeatedly raped Mégan, including with a 29-inch-long broom handle. She arrived at the hospital with life-threatening internal injuries so horrific that medical staff wept and needed psychological counseling.
Mégane arrived at the hospital with life-threatening internal injuries, including perforations of her colon, small intestine, peritoneum, and diaphragm. She also suffered a collapsed lung and fractured ribs.
Emergency responders who attended the scene were offered psychological care and support, with many emergency responders also breaking down in tears at the condition of the victim, France Bleu reported at the time.
“Investigators are shocked, they have never seen so much barbarity,” one source familiar with the case told France Bleu.
(Continue)
U.K. Officials Warn Schools: Student Artwork Could Run Afoul of Sharia
For the past few years, municipal councils in northern England have instructed schoolteachers to refrain from asking students to draw images of Jesus or Muhammad or even the human figure because the “three-dimensional figurative imagery of humans is considered idolatrous by some Muslims.”
The guidance to schools on “sensitivity and awareness around faiths and beliefs” has sparked outrage, with public intellectuals and Christian voices condemning it as an attempt to impose Shariah law on schools and accusing it of co-opting biblical characters as Muslim prophets.
A 32-page booklet, which effectively imposes Islamic codes of behavior on non-Muslims was first issued in 2022. The booklet, titled Sharing the Journey, distributed in cities with large Muslim populations, including Leeds, Doncaster, Calderdale, Oldham, and Wakefield, encouraged teachers to listen to Muslim parents over “sensitivities” about their children participating in certain forms of art, dance, drama, music, and physical and religious education.
“It is very important that the school understands this and is also careful not to ask its students to reproduce images of Jesus, the Prophet Mohammed, or other figures considered to be prophets in Islam. Some Muslim pupils may not wish to draw the human figure,” the guidance states.
The booklet did not arouse much objection in 2022, but its reissuance in 2026 has prompted an outcry from politicians and intellectuals who object to state-funded schools enforcing Islamic codes of conduct on non-Muslim students.
“Can it REALLY now be an official government diktat that children in primary school, say, are forbidden to draw Adam & Eve in the Garden of Eden or the baby Jesus in the manger?” award-winning historian, author, and broadcaster, Tom Holland asked on X.
“After all, if it’s a Muslim tradition not to illustrate the Biblical figures appropriated by Islam as prophets, there is also quite a strong Christian tradition of portraying Biblical scenes in art—as will be more than clear to students when they go on trips to art galleries,” Holland observed.
(Continue)
THEY DON’T WANT THE FRENCH TO BE FRENCH ANYMORE
On banquets , barbarians, and the civilization France is choosing to lose. Three thousand five hundred people in Colmar, France, sat down ...
-
Há 50 anos, o número total de cidadãos estrangeiros em Portugal não era superior aos 32 mil. Hoje em dia, são mais de 1,5 milhões e em sete ...
-
No livro "Por dentro do Chega" , o jornalista Miguel Carvalho fala de "um partido de fanáticos que não faz grande reflexão...
-
S ome excerts of this study from United Nations : "(...) Focusing on these two striking and critical trends, the present study addre...




