Rodrigo Guedes de Carvalho: Imigrantes têm de respeitar os nossos valores e hábitos culturais

 

Curriculum racista em escolas de Sheffield

 

Um grupo de escolas de Sheffield ficou sob fogo depois de introduzir planos de aula que dizem às crianças de apenas sete anos que as pessoas brancas desfrutam de privilégios raciais e que as pessoas negras são incapazes de serem racistas em relação às pessoas brancas, o que provocou acusações de "doutrinação política" de políticos conservadores.

 

Os planos de aula, elaborados por uma aliança escolar de ensino supostamente liderada pela Notre Dame alta School, uma escola nacional de ensino designada pelo governo, supostamente visam "capacitar" estudantes e professores para desafiar "os sistemas desiguais que nos rodeiam na sociedade. "

 

O Expresso entende que os materiais fazem uma distinção entre preconceito racial e racismo, dizendo aos alunos mais velhos que embora os negros possam abrigir preconceitos com os brancos, isso fica aquém do racismo, que os planos de lição definem como algo que só aqueles com poder cultural, como os brancos, são capazes de fazer exibindo.

 

Crianças com idades entre 7 e 11 anos são supostamente ensinadas que as pessoas brancas na Grã-Bretanha são "provavelmente privilegiadas" devido à cor da pele Os materiais da lição afirmam, de acordo com o Telegraph: "Na Grã-Bretanha, as pessoas brancas são provavelmente privilegiadas pela cor de sua pele. Este privilégio surge porque são muito menos susceptíveis de serem afetados por comportamentos racistas, incluindo preconceitos, discriminação e abuso verbal e físico. "

 

Também se entende que os alunos são informados de que "as pessoas privilegiadas têm a responsabilidade de reduzir o racismo, tendo consciência disso; melhorando a sua própria língua e comportamento; desafiando a língua e o comportamento dos seus amigos; denunciando incidentes de racismo; prestando apoio àqueles que foram prejudicados pela discriminação. "

 

De acordo com o relatório, os alunos do ensino secundário também são apresentados com estatísticas de justiça penal, incluindo a alegação de que as pessoas negras enfrentam a paragem e a busca pela polícia a dez vezes a taxa de pessoas brancas e têm significativamente mais probabilidade de receber penas de prisão por crimes relacionados com drogas. As perguntas nessa secção parecem decorrer do pressuposto de que esta disparidade é o resultado do racismo.

 

Daily Express 

 

"O recuo que o preto teve depois de que se separou do branco..."

 

Britain is a nation where Islamist extremists have been a primary criminal concern

 

The battle lines for the preservation of Western civilization were drawn long before the murder of the Dutch filmmaker Theo van Gogh in 2004. The double-dealing actions of many European leaders have been endlessly on display for all to see.

Now, both the US and Israel -- in their quest to stop the indefatigable enemies of the West and maintain free trade, democracy, and military deterrence against these predators -- may have found themselves thwarted. By whom? By their "allies," no less: Belgium, France, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

 

These nations, along with Norway, Denmark, Slovenia and Canada, have imposed sanctions, restrictions, and punitive measures of various sorts against Israel during its efforts to defend itself -- and them! -- against enemies of civilization and the West. The threat, with ballistic missiles, was to come from Iran, about to achieve nuclear weapons capability in two weeks or less, as well as from the regime's proxy jihadist forces, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.

 

Similar measures, designed to frustrate the Israel-America coalition against an openly predatory Iran, seem to have arisen from two main sources. The first has been the anti-democratic influence of Islam in the domestic affairs of Western Europe; the second, from a deep-seated anti-Semitic doctrine in Europe, now more present than ever – and being strongly reinforced.

 

Jews have been unwelcome wherever they were since the time of the Pharaohs 4,000 years ago. Jews have been expelled by the Babylonians in 597 BCE, the Romans in 136 CE, the English in 1290, the French in 1306, and the Spanish in 1492. Since the atrocities of the Holocaust in the 1940s, when Germany sent Jews to camps to be tortured, starved and murdered, hatred of the Jews seemed to have lain dormant. Not for long.

 

Now, Jew-hate in the West -- thanks to a widespread alliance between neo-Marxists, climate activists and Islamist propagandists – has once again become unashamedly "normalized" and mainstreamed -- even, in some quarters, quite popular. Discord between Western allies -- ostensibly due to contrasting views towards Islam and Israel -- has recently escalated to a new height. Its core most likely consists of a deep-seated envy that a handful of scruffy, hunted people managed to transform a land of sand dunes, deserts and malarial swamps into a gleaming superpower -- all while defending themselves against unrelenting neighboring countries trying to snuff them out. 

 

Such an achievement must, of course, be punished. First, the Western alliance of 40 nations imposed sanctions on Israel while it was defending not only its own existence but theirs as well. These were immediately followed by revived demands to establish a belligerent Palestinian state directly on Israel's border, despite Palestinians themselves having rejected the offer of both a Palestinian state and a "two-state solution" six times in favor of a one-state solution "from the [Jordan] river to the [Mediterranean] sea": all of Israel.

 

The purpose of these nations was apparently to benefit an ostensible "people" who not only admit to having been "invented, " but who for decades have been unabashedly committed to annihilating Israel. As proposed by the US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee: "If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I have a suggestion for them — carve out a piece of the French Riviera and create a Palestinian state. They are welcome to do that, but they are not welcome to impose that kind of pressure on a sovereign nation."

 

In March, US President Donald J. Trump, planning his joint effort with Israel to terminate Iran's nuclear program, made a request of US allies. He did not ask Europe for troops or even weapons. He merely asked if US airplanes could fly over their airspace or for use of military bases, which the US has not only been funding to protect – take a guess: Europe – but some of which, such as the base on Diego Garcia it actually co-owns with the United Kingdom. After earlier refusals by Europe and Canada to help with the war -- a move that would have been in their own interests -- his requests were denied.

Iran, it turned out, indeed possesses ballistic missiles capable of reaching deep into Europe, yet European nations remained unperturbed.

 

These European nations, endeavoring to claim the high moral ground by appealing to "international law" and vaunted human rights, voiced their intention not to become embroiled, either actively or passively, in America and Israel's purportedly illegal operation, despite the US having become "embroiled" in their threats from Russia. Trump then expressed his displeasure by pulling 5,000 US troops out of Germany, and is weighing removing more troops from Italy and Spain.

 

The detachment from reality of Europe's craven leaders also extends to ignoring not only Iran's diabolical treatment of its own citizens, but also the murderous attacks it has carried out against innocent Jews and others worldwide. Meanwhile, Iran and its jihadist proxies appear innocent of the Western "infidel" concepts of just wars, international laws, human rights or the Geneva conventions. They are mainly directed, it seems, by medieval Sharia law.

 

Since World War II, the US has been the backbone of NATO, while Europe has parasitically fed off America to jump to its defense. Instead of developing military preparedness, Europeans have, for years, reduced their forces in favor of funding, in addition to their own citizens, millions of newcomers who are not shy about saying how much they loathe their new domiciles, and destroying their economies by adopting "green energy," such as wind turbines, which they were warned could never work. Without the burden of building functioning militaries, at first their economies prospered enormously – at America's expense. They have now been exposed as "paper tigers," while Russia is in the midst of trying to seize Crimea and Ukraine.

 

Europe as a whole has an enormous economy -- $32 trillion, the same size as America's. Together, they are the world's two largest economies. Their members can afford significant military spending, and Trump has been requesting it. In fairness, however, after Europe began two world wars in the last century, there did not seem to be a great appetite for Europe -- read Germany -- to be able to try that again.

In addition, NATO is constituted, presumably deliberately, as a defensive alliance, not an offensive one. The reluctance of NATO members to participate in the Iran campaign as part of a NATO team is therefore somewhat understandable. Even so, there is no reason for them not to participate individually, outside the NATO umbrella – as the US has been doing, especially in providing the use of military bases and flyover rights.

 

Trump, again, did not withhold his thoughts: "All of those countries that can't get jet fuel because of the Strait of Hormuz, like the United Kingdom, which refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran, I have a suggestion for you: Number 1, buy from the US, we have plenty, and Number 2, build up some delayed courage, go to the Strait, and just take it. You'll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won't be there to help you anymore, just like you weren't there for us."

 

Without America, Europe is lost – as it was in both World Wars. In the circumstances, due to the fast growth of Islamic power in Europe, it might be wise for UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his equally hapless – when not harmful -- counterpart in France, President Emmanuel Macron, to relocate their nuclear weapons to US territory. Islam has begun dominating the continent with mosques, Sharia courts, Islamic schools, halal food supply -- and electing radicals to influential political positions at local or council levels as well as on national platforms.

 

"Leadership in times of crisis," it has been said, "is not measured by the absence of risk, but by the willingness to accept it." In avoiding risk, the cowardly leaders of Western Europe – those sell-outs to an increasingly antagonistic extremist Muslim electorate upon whom they are increasingly dependent for political office -- are a disgrace to their nations. They are also a great disappointment to those who believe in the preservation of history's finest civilization – one with freedom, democracy, human rights, and an embedded Judeo-Christian moral foundation.

 

These leaders seemingly reject any obligation to oppose attempts to destroy their nations' traditional way of life. In the tradition of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, who in 1938 imagined that he had a peace deal with Hitler, they have taken on a greater risk: that of appeasement.

European nations, it appears, have succumbed to Islamization. Their rapidly changing demographics reveal it; their failure to adequately protect their small Jewish communities against vociferous hate reveal it; their compromise on basic individual freedoms in their own countries reveal it, and their refusals to support the US, their erstwhile protector, reveal it.

 

Islamic extremists must feel immensely emboldened in their imperialist endeavors to colonize Europe.

The fecklessness of these weak leaders who turn their backs on efforts by the US and Israel to save the West has been fully exposed. The ultimate intent of Islamization, seemingly, is to dismantle Western civilization and impose a worldwide Islamic caliphate under Sharia law -- as has been successfully achieved in Turkey, formerly the great Christian Byzantine Empire, as well as much of North Africa and central and south Asia.

 

In the UK, this process of Islamification has borne much fruit: Islam has become a dominant culture. Examples abound: the failure adequately to deal with the long-term mass sexual abuse of hundreds of thousands of English children, and the increasing arrests of British citizens who, either online or in person, criticize the UK's staggering cultural erosion.

 

Demographically, Britain is now a nation where the most popular name for baby boys, for 16 years running, is Mohammed (in its various spellings). Britain is a nation where Islamist extremists have been a primary criminal concern; where social cohesion is fractured, and where the "old world" will shortly be replaced by a culture not just free of Judeo-Christian values but that is adversarial to them.

Welcome to the new Europe. Its antagonists are inside the gate -- without firing a single shot.

 

Steve Harvey 

 

 

Europe, Muslims and Crime: some detailed views

 

 "(...)

The fact is that in 2016, The Muslim News noted, “The number of Muslim prisoners in British jails has doubled over the past ten years.” In the US, a Muslim group called Muslim Advocates published research establishing “that Muslims are overrepresented in state prisons by a factor of eight relative to the general population. In some state systems, Muslims are overrepresented by a factor of closer to 18, with more than 20% of prisoners identifying as Muslim. The absolute number of Muslim prisoners has also increased over time, even as prison populations in many states have tended to decrease in the last few years.”

(...) 

  National Audit on Group-Based Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse referred to a 2015 study which recommended “researching the possible reasons for the disproportionate involvement of perpetrators from a Pakistani and/or Muslim ethnic or cultural background in group-based child sexual exploitation.” It stated that “with a significant proportion of those found guilty nationally of group Child Sexual Exploitation being from a Pakistani and/or Muslim heritage, relevant government departments should research why this is the case, in order to guide prevention strategies.” 

(...)

The fact is a report from the Brookings Institution stated, “Muslims are greatly overrepresented in prisons and within the 18 to 24-year-old age group in particular: they make up only 8.5% of that age cohort in France, yet 39.9% of all prisoners in the cohort.”

(...)

In Germany, the fact is that the BBC reported that research commissioned by the government found migrants “may have fueled violent crime rise.” In the Lower Saxony region of Germany, 17% of crimes attributed to migrants were suspected of being committed by North Africans, whose majority religion is Islam, even though this group makes up less than 1% of the state’s migrant population.  

(...)

The fact is independent analysis and figures from Danmarks Statistik show “there were 5,921 violent crime convictions in 2021, of which 71% (4,193) were committed by people of Danish origin and 29% (1,728) by immigrants and their descendants. In 2021, immigrants and their descendants represented 14% (817,438) and people of Danish origin 86% (5,022,607) of the total population of 5,840,045. 

Thus, immigrants and descendants are overrepresented in violent crime convictions, being 14% of the population and constituting 29% of the violent crime convictions. This translates into immigrants and descendants having 2.5 times higher conviction rates than natives.” Furthermore, this analysis also established the fact that persons who had the highest violent crime conviction rates expressed in multiples of the Danish conviction rate were from Kuwait, Tunisia, Lebanon, Somalia and Jordan, and they were seven to nine times greater than the Danish conviction rates. 

(...) 

 

Barcelona: Europe’s Capital of Crime and Islamism - Foreigners reponsible for 91 % of thefts, 78% of total arrests

 

Barcelona Reveals How Policies Designed to Engineer a Separate National Agenda Have Instead Produced a Geostrategic Vulnerability

Barcelona stands today as Europe’s clearest warning of what happens when mass illegal immigration, organized crime mafias, and Islamist radicalization converge on a strategically vital Mediterranean city.

As the capital of Catalonia (the second most important region of Spain), Barcelona reveals how policies designed to engineer a separate national agenda have instead produced a geostrategic vulnerability on the European Union’s southern flank.

In 2024, Catalan police recorded 21,808 arrests in Barcelona. Foreign nationals accounted for 17,158 of them, or 78.7 percent. Theft drove the statistics: 5,442 arrests, with foreigners responsible for 4,942, or 91 percent. 

Foreign criminal networks, debt-bonded African migrants, and expanding Islamist networks exploit the same autonomy and permissive policies that Catalan leaders once believed would isolate them from Madrid. The result is a city where tourists and residents alike navigate daily threats while broader European security deteriorates.

The numbers on street crime are devastating. In 2024, Catalan police recorded 21,808 arrests in Barcelona. Foreign nationals accounted for 17,158 of them, or 78.7 percent. Theft drove the statistics: 5,442 arrests, with foreigners responsible for 4,942, or 91 percent. In violent robberies, the foreign share reached 83.5 percent. Pickpocketing remains the dominant plague around La Rambla and the Sagrada Familia area. These figures place Barcelona among the worst cities in the European Union for property crime.

This petty crime forms part of a larger ecosystem controlled by transnational mafias. Sub-Saharan migrants reach Spain through the North African enclaves of Ceuta and Melilla, Europe’s only land border with Africa.

Unlike the situation along the southern border of the United States, where many individuals attempt crossings independently, the European route operates as an industrial-scale business run by organized networks. Traffickers extract payment through debt bondage. Once in Catalonia, sub-Saharan men often work as ‘manteros’—selling counterfeit goods on blankets in public spaces—or engage in other illegal activities to repay the smugglers. Failure to pay brings threats against families back in Africa.

More sophisticated syndicates operate above this level. Balkan clans fight turf wars over cocaine routes through Barcelona’s port. Russian and Georgian networks launder money through real estate and hospitality businesses. Romanian groups dominate segments of organized theft. These mafias thrive in the jurisdictional gray zones created by Catalonia’s high degree of political autonomy.

The Islamist challenge runs deeper and carries graver strategic consequences. Catalonia holds Spain’s largest Muslim population, approximately 700,000 people, representing around 10 percent of the regional total and well above the national average. On the other hand, more than 300 mosques and places of worship operate in the region.

Radicalization has concentrated in certain towns. In 2017, an Islamic State-inspired cell from Ripoll executed the deadliest attack in Spain since 2004, driving a van through crowds on La Rambla (Barcelona) and carrying out a second assault in Cambrils. The attacks killed 16 people and injured more than 140. The cell drew on locally radicalized youths of Moroccan origin.

May 15, 2026 

(Continue) 

Middle East Forum Online 

About 16% of the total population of foreigners accounted for 34% of suspects in crimes in Germany

 

 
The closest thing to an official figure is the number of French inmates who registered for Ramadan – 18,300 out of a total prison population of 67,700, or 27%, back in 2013 according to Agence France Presse.A Brookings Institution report says that “Muslims are greatly overrepresented in prisons and within the eighteen- to twenty-four–year-old age group in particular: they make up only 8.5 percent of that age population in France, yet 39.9 percent of all prisoners in the cohort.”

This, obviously, is not to suggest that France doesn’t have a serious problem with integrating Muslim men (in England and Wales, 15% of the prison population is Muslim from a total population of 5%). This is pertinent to Muslims since 46 per cent of them live in the 10% most deprived local authority districts in Britain today. 

Labour MP David Lammy last week revealed the results of an independent review into the treatment of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) individuals in the criminal justice system. One of the most shocking findings was that Muslims account for 15 per cent of Britain’s prisoners – a 50 per cent increase since ten years ago – despite being under 5 per cent of its population.

The proportion of foreign-born inmates in German prisons is now at a record high, according to a new survey of the justice ministries in Germany's 16 federal states. In Berlin and Hamburg, for example, more than 50% of inmates are now from abroad, according to the report, which also revealed a spike in the number of Islamists in the German prison system.

The data, compiled by the newspaper Rheinische Post, shows that the surge of foreign-born inmates began in 2015, when Chancellor Angela Merkel allowed into Germany more than a million mostly unvetted migrants from Africa, Asia and the Middle East.

Ahead of the presentation of the 2025 figures for crime in Germany by the Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA), Susann Prätor has shared her thoughts on the issue of nationality and statistics. She is a sociologist, psychologist and legal scholar. Her work as an expert on crime draws on these diverse perspectives.

More than a third of all suspects are not German citizens. About 16% of the total population of Germany don't have German citizenship, yet they accounted for roughly 34% of suspects in crimes as diverse as theft, burglary and violent crimes. In 2024, there was a 7.5% increase in violent crime involving suspects with non-German nationality. But experts point out that this may be due to a rise in reporting rather than actual incidents.

 

Carlos Moedas, um traidor subserviente perante o Islão

 

Nas eleições legislativas e autárquicas de maio de 2025, o partido de extrema-direita "Ergue-te" planeou terminar a sua campanha com uma manifestação na Praça do Martim Moniz. Carlos Moedas, através de um despacho, opôs-se à realização desse evento específico no Martim Moniz, classificando a iniciativa como uma "afronta à dignidade de comunidades residentes" e uma ameaça à convivência democrática. 

O documento legal emitido pela autarquia não fazia qualquer interdição à Cruz de Cristo ou alusão de que esta seria proibida por ofender religiões. O Polígrafo da SIC Notícias afirma que a autarquia baseou-se em razões de ordem pública e paz social para recusar a ação num bairro multicultural da cidade.

 Em 1147, as tropas de D. Afonso Henriques, amparadas por cavaleiros templários e cruzados, cercaram os muçulmanos em Lisboa, forçando a redenção dos sarracenos. Aí se celebrizou o amor sacrificial e pátrio de Martim Moniz, cuja memória é hoje um corpo de injúrias.

Volvidos quase 900 anos, Carlos Moedas, presidente da Câmara de Lisboa e serviçal do globalismo bildergiano, classificou o cristianismo - sem a qual Portugal não existiria e hoje pertenceria a qualquer califado - como provocatória perante um credo minoritário que, nos países onde é prevalecente, persegue os cristãos, numa subsversiência rastejante e medíocre.

No fundo, Carlos Moeda pisou e desdenhou o cerco de 1147, gracejou da memória de D. Afonso Henriques, ridicularizou o sacríficio de Martim Moniz, escarneceu do sangue cristão derramado pela nossa fundação e soberania.

Carlos Moedas é um traidor de consciência e memória. Um qualquer Buiça, Miguel Vasconcelos ou Otelo Saraiva Carvalho. Alguém que justamente será lançado ao pó da indiferença. Reencaminhada muitas vezes, partilha para que um Martim Moniz reencarne e faça justiça.