According to this poll, 52% of the British Muslims surveyed believed that homosexuality should not be legal in the United Kingdom (compared to 5% of the general public). 31% of Muslims thought it was acceptable for a man to have more than one wife (compared to 19% of the general public who disagreed).
39% of Muslims agreed that wives must always obey their husbands (compared to 5% of the general public). 4% stated they sympathized with people who take part in suicide bombings, while 85% showed no sympathy at all. 21% supported stoning as a punishment for adultery.
Commenting on these results, journalist Trevor Phillips said that Muslims were "building 'a nation within a nation.'" Trevor Phillips, a journalist and former leader of the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), was born in London but is Black—his parents emigrated from Guyana after World War II.
In an interview with The Guardian, the former leader of the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) admitted that he "got almost everything wrong" regarding immigration in a previous report. Phillips claims that followers of Islam have very different values from the rest of society and that many want to lead separate lives. The former chairman of the UK Equality and Human Rights Commission also advocates for controlling ethnic minority populations in social housing neighborhoods, which should not exceed 50% to prevent them from becoming ghettos."
Trevor Phillips also said that schools may have to consider a 50 percent cap on Muslim or other minority students to encourage social integration. And he states that the disturbing findings of recent investigations point to a growing chasm between the attitudes of many British Muslims and those of their fellow citizens. Trevor Phillips justified his statement—"Muslims are building 'a nation within a nation'"—with the following points:
Failure of Multiculturalism: It stated that liberal integration policies failed because they wrongly assumed that Muslim communities would gradually blend into the fabric of Western society
Divergence of Values: It pointed out that the poll revealed resistance to cultural assimilation, with a significant percentage of respondents expressing very conservative views on homosexuality, the role of women, and the enforcement of Sharia law.
Social Segregation: It warned that the country risked isolating and sacrificing generations of young people to values that are irreconcilable with British liberal values.
Integration vs. Separation: 35% believed that Muslims should do more to integrate into British society, while 17% felt they should live separately if they so wished.
Regarding the chart reproduced above, it is easy to find examples of what happens when Muslim immigration exceeds certain levels and its population percentage rises past a certain difference. Sweden is a good example: in the last ten years, the country accepted a number of foreign residents that today represents (including second generations) around 27% of the inhabitants.
Once considered one of the safest countries in the world, Sweden currently ranks second among European countries with the most homicides. Despite representing only 27% of the population, individuals of immigrant background (1st and 2nd generations) are responsible for between 60% and 63% of rapes.
About thirty years ago (around 1996), the Muslim population in Europe represented approximately 4% of the continent's total inhabitants, which equated to about 30 million people. This number has nearly doubled, with a total of immigrants that currently stands at around 50 million.
What happens when the Muslim population grows translates into a social and political pattern that is replicated in every European country to varying degrees—from one to nine, as seen in the chart reproduced above. Muslims did not come to coexist, but to conquer. Statements by Islamic preachers with this content exist by the thousands on social media. It is not possible to find the videos from islamic preachers with a opposite view.
Great Britain has now reached the 6th stage. In Portugal, we are already in the 5th stage, noticeable in perfectly explicit details that are purposely ignored by journalists who are genuinely terrified of being accused of xenophobia or islamophobia.
While they are at 1% of the population, Muslims show themselves to be humble and peaceful, highlighting their good interaction in Portuguese society, as Sheikh David Munir, imam of the Lisbon Mosque, has always made a point of emphasizing. The sheikh is widely recognized for his moderate, integrative stance and his defense of interreligious dialogue. Yet he is the one who reveals to SIC TV the existence of Islamic ghettos in Portugal—a phase of Islamic conquest specific to the 5th degree.
Sheikh David Munir, the iman of Lisbon's Mosque, reveals that years ago "he shared his concern about some areas of Lisbon, such as Martim Moniz, but nothing was done (...) A few years ago, when some members of the community and I realized that some areas of Lisbon could become ghettos, we spoke to the responsible authorities and nothing was done” — a ridiculous observation, as if it were possible to prevent people from renting or buying houses in a certain area of the city.
Regarding the increase in immigration of Islamic origin, he recognizes integration difficulties for some immigrants arriving in Portugal, from whom he asks for “respect for the laws, rules, language, and culture,” added the imam of the Lisbon mosque, according to SIC TV, in June 2025
The transformation of the Martim Moniz area into a no-go zone for Western women, for example, is a result of this voluntary "ghettoization" by people from Bangladesh. The constitution of a ghetto cannot be avoided unless immigrants with different values and customs have the desire to integrate into the society they immigrated to. But what is evident in the Muslim community is the desire not to integrate, in any way, into Portuguese society — an exclusion that begins with the conspicuous maintenance of a different way of dressing, for both women and men.
That is why, around each mosque, non-Muslims are gradually disappearing, mainly due to the intimidation targeted at Westerners in general and, especially, women. However, it must be recognized that Muslims are not the only ones forming ghettos in Portugal. It is true that the African minority, whose type of integration is apparently stronger than that of Muslims, also organizes itself into ghettos that are much more violent no-go zones than the Muslim ones.
In both cases, the criminalization of the second generations of these communities is identical and rooted in the fact that both perceive "white people" as "weak" and unable to impose themselves physically. If we compare Portuguese emigration from the 1960s with these immigrants, it becomes clear that newly arrived Portuguese in France—just to cite one example—lived in shantytowns, but the second generation did not turn to crime. On the contrary, they integrated perfectly. It all boils down to a matter of an incompatible culture—the Quran and Sharia versus the Bible—and the social conditioning of the African minority.
Muslims hold values, based on the Quran and Sharia, that are more important to them, though completely incompatible with the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic. Their integration into a Western society will never be possible because, in essence, non-Muslims remain "infidels" who do not accept Islam. The only form of Muslim integration occurs when, through various phenomena—mass immigration, exceptionally high birth rates, and the appropriation of a substantial share of State resources through subsidies and housing—they manage to reach sufficient numbers to gain political weight and control the country, like it happened in Lebanon.
These phenomena are facilitated by the support of left-wing liberals, for whom cultural diversity is a fundamental value, due to the opposition these immigrants offer to the capitalist State and to non-left political forces. Muslims are well aware of this submissive attitude from left-wing political groups and appear to be part of that ideological alignment, as seen with the Green Party in the UnitedKingdom.
On the other hand, the African minority builds much more aggressive ghettos, where the police can only enter with special units and forces comprising at least two dozen men. In this case, culture is not the issue—we speak the same language, we were educated in a Judeo-Christian context—but rather a problem of values. The societies from which African immigration originates are violent by nature, given the absence of a State recognized by its citizens as just and, consequently, deemed fit to maintain order.
The dominant kleptocracy and the miserable financial condition in which about 80% of the population lives (below the poverty line) create an absence of values that reflects in the high crime rate of this minority. Although the Government does not collect or publish data on the race of inmates in Portuguese prisons, there are correctional facilities where inmates of African descent account for over 60% of the detainees.
Returning to the issue of self-exclusion within the Muslim community regarding integration, the loss of old characteristics in downtown Lisbon continues at an accelerated pace, with souvenir shops paying 5,000 euros in rent and having 400 registered workers in a smal shop, 15 or 20 square meters, or apartments where 600 people "live." The inability of political authorities, especially at the municipal level, to prevent this degradation stems from the same attitude held by municipal authorities, police, and social workers in Rotherham, who for years ignored the abuse of British minors by Pakistani gangs, mostly from dysfunctional families.
The police involvement in the Rotherham child sexual abuse scandal centers on a systemic failure by Pakistani Muslim gangs to protect around 1,400 victims between 1997 and 2013. The South Yorkshire Police (SYP) faces heavy and ongoing scrutiny after investigations revealed that officers ignored warning signs, dismissed victims as mere runaways, and, in some cases, were perpetrators of abuse themselves. But the main reason for this inaction by the Rotherham police was related to a fact—confessed by themselves—that officers and social workers feared being accused of racism and xenophobia, a situation where they would be publicly lynched by liberal left-wing political forces.
Nowadays, tourists do not even walk up Rua do Benformoso, warned as they are by tour guides about the risks they face in that area—mainly the theft of mobile phones or bags by purse-snatching. This is not to mention the constant harassment and intimidation by hundreds of Hindustanic people who spend the day there, standing on the sidewalks in groups of three or four, doing nothing but talking on their mobile phones. Carlos Moedas, the Mayor of Lisbon and the other municipal leaders react in the same way as the Rotherham police—they do nothing out of the same fear of accusations of xenophobia and racism.
Other left-wing politicians, like the ineffable Ana Gomes, show gestures of submission by distributing red carnations to immigrants who had been the target of a police raid days before. It did not cross her mind—but that is just how the Left is—that at the hour the raid took place—midafternoon—it made no sense having over a hundred men aged 30 to 40 to be standing there on the sidewalks of Rua do Benformoso, a time when people are supposed to be working."
Going back 20 years, we can see that the successful integration of the Islamic community has some flaws. In one of his Friday sermons, Sheikh Munir recommended that all believers read a book, 'The Virtues of Actions' (Portuguese version available here), written between 1929 and 1964 (also known as Faza'il-e-A'maal or Tableeghi Nisaab) by Maulana Muhammad Zakariyya. Sheikh Munir stated it was 'a useful read for any believer.' The book is an Islamic compilation of Hadiths and uplifting stories and episodes, carrying a fundamentalist and extremist nature.
The book was on sale at the Lisbon Mosque on a Friday. In that edition of the weekly newspaper O Independente, I published a two-page report about the book and the fundamentalist organization Tablighi Jamaat—which is banned in Saudi Arabia, where the government classified the group as a 'gate to terrorism'—and already held significant weight within the Islamic Community of Lisbon at the time.
As soon as they noticed the news, there was a rush to remove the book from the shelves. I had the opportunity to read that book. One of the episodes recounted there stuck in my memory. In the early days of Islam, believers were preparing for a battle against their enemies. A mother called her five sons and ordered them to focus solely on heading toward the enemy leader's position during the battle and killing him.
After the battle ended in victory for the Muslims, they went to tell the mother that her five sons had been killed, but they had managed to kill the enemy leader. The mother's reaction, as written in the book, was one of intense jubilation, and weeping with joy, she thanked Allah for granting her the honor of having five martyr sons. The book contains dozens of episodes of this nature, alternating with legal advice and interpretations of the Quran.
Portugal has skipped some 'steps' in the specific progression of the Muslim conquest, thanks to the extreme submissiveness of Portuguese society and left-wing politicians. When the Islamic community reaches 2% to 3% of the population, it begins to recruit heavily, primarily targeting young people from dysfunctional families.
In the pursuit of power within any country, Islamism relies on the collaboration of Left-wing forces, namely party organizations with characteristics similar to those of Bloco de Esquerda and Livre. Another feature of this phase (between 2% and 3% of the population) is the policy of attracting young students, with visits to the mosques, which shows how Leftism still dominates a substantial portion of Portuguese teaching members.
The need to prove that there is no Islamophobia in Portuguese society is well demonstrated by the submissive attitude of the former President of the Republic, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa, who visited the Lisbon Mosque four times, ignoring all other religious faiths and his own religion, Catholicism.
During one of these visits, Marcelo Rebelo de Sousa went so far as to kneel, opening the palms of his hands toward the sky—a typical gesture that Muslim believers make during their prayers
However, the submissive behaviors of the then-President also included a visit to the Islamic School of Palmela, where, inside the classrooms, boys and girls sit in separate spaces, side by side.
With the mass arrival of South Asian Muslims, the Islamic Community of Lisbon entered a crisis. These Muslims do not accept the religious authority of Sheikh Munir, the iman of Lisbon's Mosque and have their own places of worship, with their own imans.
In fact, for the first time, the Bangladeshi Islamic Community, based at the Baitul Mukarram Mosque, organized a prayer session in Martim Moniz on May 27th to celebrate Eid al-Adha (known as the 'Feast of Sacrifice'), without any visible presence of the Islamic Community of Lisbon. This is one of the most important celebrations in the Islamic calendar, commemorating Prophet Abraham's total devotion to God by being willing to sacrifice his son, who was ultimately replaced by a ram.
Bangladeshi nationals currently number around 80,000—according to their leader, Rana Taslim Uddin, a figure in an episode where, during a speech to the Community's leadership, he stated: 'Those who found a new society here, those who are present here today, ask me what I have done for society. Brothers, I did it to make my God happy, not for society. If God is happy, He will bring a solution for society and lead this society onto the right path. If He is not happy, then He will destroy this society.'
The 5th step of the Muslim conquest of a Christian country—the stage in which Portugal currently finds itself—involves a very specific set of situations:"
1 – Demand for "Halal" food in schools (The municipalities of Loures and Odivelas have already done so).
2 – Existence of prayer rooms in schools (a demand only in areas where the Muslim students exceeds 5%) and the construction of more Islamic schools. In this area, the Muslim community's strategy is well-defined. According to Al-madinah, a magazine of the Islamic Community of the South Bank of the Tagus, "In mainstream schools (…) it becomes impossible to safeguard the faith.
The solution lies in creating Islamic institutions, where children can grow up in an Islamic environment" – Al-Madinah Magazine, edition of the Islamic Community of the South Bank of the Tagus. "The more 'freedom of expression' and the 'consciousness of freedom' are propagated, the more evident it becomes (…) that these rules were not made for Muslims." – according to the same magazine, whose mentors are members of the Muslim Brotherhood.
3 – Preparation of an attempt to impose standardized clothing in schools where Muslim students are the majority, in order to forbid girls from wearing skirts. Aggressive and intimidating attitudes towards people walking dogs in areas bordering mosques, places of worship, and areas where the Muslim population is in the majority.
4 – "Adaptation" of Christmas festivities and other manifestations of a religious nature in schools, so that terms like "Christmas" or "Merry Christmas" are not used, as they could be offensive to Muslim students, according to those responsible for the José Maria dos Santos School Group in Pinhal Novo, and at the Gil Vicente School in Lisbon. Both stated that it was about removing thematic elements (like Christmas backgrounds in photos) for reasons of inclusion and respect for students from other cultures and religions.
This is a justification that only demonstrates an attitude of submission towards Muslims, the only religion that punishes apostasy with death. The "inclusion" is a system that liberal leftists so love, but it is a system that only works one way. The former President of the Republic visited the Lisbon Mosque four times, but Sheikh David Munir never set foot in a church.
5 – The show of force that is the occupation of public spaces, currently once a year – twice if the Islamic Community of Bangladesh (CIB) continues with its initiative, independent of the Islamic Community of Lisbon (CIL). While the latter limits itself to the closing prayer of Ramadan, the Islamic Community of Bangladesh held a different religious ceremony this year, Eid al-Adha (Feast of Sacrifice), an important celebration of the Islamic calendar.
In both cases, the locations (for many years, in the case of the final Ramadan prayer) are not chosen by chance. The religious celebrations take place at Martim Moniz Square and Afonso Henriques Avenue – choices that are not innocent, because they symbolize the great Christian victory, in the war against Al-Andalus, which was the conquest of the city of Lisbon.
6 – Special schedules for Muslim students to allow them to fulfill prayer obligations or, alternatively, the establishment of prayer rooms within the school premises. This early departure of Muslim students for prayers involved, for example, the José Saramago Secondary School, located in Palmela, where its principal, Faisal Aboobakar, a Muslim, instructed teachers to allow Muslim students to leave early to fulfill Ramadan obligations.
7 – Implementation of Islamic courts and Islamic law, Sharia: an Islamic court has been operating for over twenty years on the premises of the Lisbon Mosque, presided over by Sheikh Munir and composed of a "group of wise men." In the approximately 60 places of worship scattered across the country, over thirty Islamic courts operate, whose validity is null and void under the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic. However, due to pressure and fear of being ostracized by the rest of the community, Muslims do not resort to legal courts, preferring instead to submit to this null justice.
8 – Insertion into the political sphere, starting in Islamic ghetto areas, at the municipal level. As more Muslims acquire the right to vote, their concentration in specific zones of each city or town allows for massive and concentrated voting for their candidates.
In the local council elections, reports indicated that over 290 Muslims were elected nationwide to various local government seats. Birmingham has 29.9% Muslims. It is the city with the highest proportion and concentration of Muslim citizens among the three largest cities in England. London has about 15% and Leeds 7.8 percent. These are the three most populated cities in England. A large number os politicians of foreign origin has been elected but it's not possible to evaluate the right number. In May 2026, Birmingham opened its city council ceremony with an Islamic prayer as it welcomed its first Muslim Liberal Democrat Lord Mayor.
Added to this are hundreds of councilors and other elected municipal positions held by ethnic minorities, with special emphasis on those of Muslim origin. Some recent cases have sparked controversy in the United Kingdom. Rukhsana Ismail, appointed ceremonial Mayor of Rotherham (a city in northern England), spoke for about eight minutes. She spoke for seven minutes in English and kept only the last minute to leave a message in her mother tongue.
Also, Zaker Choudhry, of Pakistani origin and newly sworn in as Lord Mayor of Birmingham, generated reactions due to his very slow, halting reading style in English with a visible lack of fluency during the official ceremony at the Birmingham City Council. The mayor chose to give part of his family thanks in Urdu.
9 – Finally, the issue of anti-Semitism. At the Islamic book fairs, which occurred every year at the Lisbon Mosque, it was common to see books by white supremacists and anti-Semites for sale. That fair was an opportunity to acquire works by David Duke, an American neo-Nazi, Holocaust denier, and supporter of white supremacy.
David Duke was National President of the European-American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO) and a leader of the Ku Klux Klan. Example of one publication available to the public at that fair: "How Israeli Terrorism and Betrayal of America Caused the 9/11 Attack". Other works published by David Duke: "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century" and "Did Six Million Really Die?", also available at the same Islamic book fair. David Duke was also the founder of the "National Association for the Advancement of White People", a racist and anti-Semitic organization. These works were edited by Youssf Adamgy, director of the Portuguese Islamic magazine Al-Furqán.
In that same magazine, in 1988, an article was published, with a front-page call, questioning "Are Jews endowed with humanity? (…) The Jew hates everyone who is not a Jew (…) 'Jews proper are not human beings (…) Jews are enemies of all those who are not, and seek to do them all possible harm. Perhaps that is why Hitler wanted to annihilate this damned people', the text concluded. The article was authored by Sheikh Aminuddin Mohamad, at the time spiritual advisor to the Islamic Community of Lisbon (presided over by banker Abdul Karim Vakil).
Evolution of the Islamic conquest of Western countries, according with their percentage of population
1% or less: Image of a peaceful minority.
2–3%: Recruitment intensifies (prisons, gangs, youths from dysfunctional families, the homeless). UK prison authorities make deals with organized Muslim groups, without whom they cannot manage the prisons, given the dominance Muslims exercise over other inmates. The criminalization of the second generation of Muslim immigrants is evident in official figures: they make up around 6% of the population but account for 17% of detainees. Most crimes committed by Muslims are carried out by youths and young adults.
5%: Pressure for Sharia begins — demands for halal food in schools/supermarkets, prayer rooms, Islamic dress codes, special accommodations, and harassment of politicians to finance the building of more mosques — the current situation in Portugal, with aroud 60 mosques or places of pray, with the Bangladesh community controling 14 of them. The bangladeshi community is around 80 thousand migrants, 20 thousand of them already have Portuguese nationality.
6%: England is now at this level: acquisition of political power at the municipal level, election of Muslim MPs (25 MPs, representing 4% of all MPs), population concentration in towns and cities, implementation of Sharia through numerous Islamic courts, entire neighborhoods that are effectively off-limits to non-Muslims through the use of violence (much more pronounced in the case of journalists), dominance of Muslim youths over their peers in schools through group violence, total control of detainees in prisons, sexual violence against women and underage girls. In this matter, the “defense” of many Muslims in court is the same: those women dressed like prostitutes, were not virgins, therefore Sharia does not forbid rape. Also, submission of the Nation’s highest representatives - as visible in King Charles III’s Ramadan message.
At 10%: Crime increases drastically. Complaints turn into riots and threats. Non-Muslim “offenses” (cartoons, freedom of speech, criticism of Islam) trigger violence, car burnings, and chaos in the streets. “No-go” zones multiply (where authorities do not enter). Politicians begin yielding to the Muslim voting bloc. (See France and parts of Sweden today.)
At 15%: The breaking point hits hard. Serious riots become routine. Jihad militias begin to form. Sporadic attacks on non-Muslims, churches, and institutions surge. Demands for Sharia patrols and parallel societies intensify. Political power shifts — local councils start being won and national politics influenced. (This is where India’s troubled regions and Lebanon’s collapse began.)
At 20%: Frequent riots, organized jihad militias, and direct attacks on non-Muslim institutions. Ethnic tensions turn into open conflict. Non-Muslims flee these areas. Enforcement of Sharia in Muslim zones becomes de facto law. Jews are especially persecuted and subjected to constant violence. (Lebanon went from a Christian majority to the hell of civil war at this stage.)
At 40%: Widespread massacres, chronic terrorist attacks, and full militia warfare. Entire regions fall under Islamic control. Non-Muslims face daily persecution.
At 60%: Persecution of non-believers, ethnic cleansing, full implementation of Sharia law, and jizya taxes imposed on the remaining infidels.
At 80%: State-run ethnic cleansing and genocide. The march toward 100% Muslim population becomes relentless.
At 100%: The “peace” of Dar al-Islam — everyone submits, pays a special tax for Christians allowed to live under Muslim rule (jizya), or dies.
THERE IS NO turning back from these numbers. High birth rates, chain migration, refusal to assimilate, and the construction of parallel societies mean that Britain is sleepwalking toward irreversible Islamization.
Portugal is going the same way, much faster. In 2017, the socialist government of Antóio Costa changed the law and introduced the possibility of any imigrant coming to Portugal, whitout any kind of visa or permission. The immigrant could come with a tourist visa and apply for a residence permit directly within the national territory, provided that they were integrated into the labor market. The result is a total number of TWO MILLION immigrants (Portugal had 10 million inhabitants, before) most of them muslims from Bangladesh and Índia.
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário