The interpretation of Quranic verses related to violence and fighting, particularly those concerning Jews, is a complex and highly debated topic. There is no single verse in the Quran that explicitly commands the killing of all Jews. However, certain verses, when taken out of their historical context or interpreted in a particular way, have been used to justify violence against them.
Here is a breakdown of the key points and verses often cited in this discussion:
Verses often cited to justify violence:
Quran 9:29: This is one of the most frequently cited verses in this context. It states: "Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled." This verse is often used to justify fighting against "People of the Book" (Jews and Christians) who do not convert to Islam, but it also specifies an alternative: paying a tax known as jizyah.
Quran 2:191: "And kill them wherever you find them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and persecution is worse than slaughter. And do not fight them at al-Masjid al-Haram until they fight you there. But if they do fight you, then kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers." This verse is part of a larger section (2:190-195) that deals with warfare and self-defense. Mainstream Islamic scholars and modern interpreters argue that this verse is conditional and applies only to those who are actively fighting against Muslims and have persecuted them, not to all non-believers.
The Debate on Interpretation and Context:
Historical Context: Many scholars argue that these verses were revealed during a specific period of conflict between the early Muslim community and tribes in Mecca and Medina, including some Jewish tribes who had broken treaties and allied with Muslim enemies. Therefore, the verses are seen as specific to those historical circumstances and not as a blanket command for all time.
The Concept of Jihad: The term jihad is often translated as "holy war," but its primary meaning in the Quran is "struggle." Islamic scholars distinguish between the greater jihad (the internal struggle to live a virtuous life) and the lesser jihad (physical fighting). The Quran places strict limitations on the lesser jihad, specifying that it should be defensive, not aggressive, and should not be used to force conversion.
Contrasting Verses: Many other verses in the Quran preach tolerance, coexistence, and justice, even with non-believers. For example, Quran 5:32 states that "whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely." Quran 60:8 also says, "Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes - from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them."
In summary: While some verses of the Quran, when read in isolation, can appear to command violence against non-believers, including Jews, the consensus among mainstream Islamic scholars is that these verses are conditional and must be understood within their historical and religious context. They are not considered a universal command to kill or persecute Jews. However, extremist groups and individuals often use these verses, decontextualized, to justify their violence.
mautitania history of slavery
Slavery has a long and deeply entrenched history in Mauritania, with its roots in a caste-based system that continues to have a profound impact on the country today. Unlike the transatlantic slave trade, slavery in Mauritania is primarily a hereditary, descent-based system.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects of Mauritania's history with slavery:
Historical Context
Chattel Slavery: Slavery in Mauritania is a form of chattel slavery, meaning that enslaved people and their descendants are considered the property of their masters. This status is inherited through the mother, ensuring that entire families remain enslaved for generations.
Racial and Ethnic Basis: The practice is tied to the country's ethnic composition. Lighter-skinned Arabs and Berbers, known as Beidane, historically enslaved the darker-skinned, often sub-Saharan African population, known as the Haratin. While slavery also exists among other groups, this Beidane-Haratin dynamic is the most prominent.
Nomadic Lifestyle: For centuries, Mauritania's nomadic lifestyle facilitated the practice. Enslaved people were a source of labor for herding, agriculture, and domestic work, and were often bought, sold, or given as gifts.
Attempts at Abolition
French Colonial Period (1904-1960): The French administration officially declared an end to slavery in 1905, but in practice, they did very little to enforce the ban. They often cited a need to respect local customs and traditions, and many slaves who fled were simply returned to their masters. This policy, in effect, allowed the system to persist.
Post-Independence (1960-1981): When Mauritania gained independence in 1960, its new constitution implicitly abolished slavery. However, like the French, the government did not take any concrete steps to enforce this. The practice continued under the guise of preserving social order and meeting the country's labor needs.
Official Abolition in 1981: Under international pressure, Mauritania became the last country in the world to officially abolish slavery in 1981. This was done via a presidential decree, but a major problem remained: there were no criminal laws to prosecute slave owners.
The Fight for Criminalization and Enforcement
Criminalization in 2007: It wasn't until 2007 that Mauritania finally passed a law making slavery a crime punishable by imprisonment. However, the law was rarely enforced, and convictions were extremely rare.
The 2015 Anti-Slavery Law: A new law in 2015 was passed, which designated slavery as a "crime against humanity" and created special courts to handle slavery cases. This was a significant step, but activists argue that the government still lacks the political will to fully enforce the law.
The Anti-Slavery Movement: Organizations like the Initiative for the Resurgence of the Abolitionist Movement (IRA), led by Biram Dah Abeid, have been instrumental in fighting for the rights of the Haratin and holding the government accountable. These activists often face government repression, including arbitrary arrests and imprisonment.
The Legacy of Slavery
Today, despite being illegal, slavery and its legacy of systemic discrimination continue to exist in Mauritania. It is often described as a "hidden" practice, where psychological and economic factors, rather than physical chains, keep people in bondage. Enslaved people are often without birth certificates, making it impossible for them to access education, healthcare, and other basic services. Even those who are freed face immense social and economic discrimination, often forcing them into a state of semi-dependency on their former masters. While official figures on the number of enslaved people vary, human rights organizations estimate tens of thousands still live in bondage
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário