Refugiados africanos com boa vida: o Estado paga tudo, até a Internet

 

New talents arrive in Spain (as Jean Raspail previewed...)

 

"In Calcutta, India, Catholic priests promote the adoption of Indian children by those back in Belgium as a form of charity. When the Belgian government realizes that the number of Indian children raised in Belgium has reached 40,000 in just five years, an emergency policy attempts to halt the migration. Desperate for the chance to send their children to what they call a "land of plenty", a mob of desperate Indians swarms the consulate. As a Belgian aid worker works through the crowd, an Indian gong farmer known only as "the turd eater", carrying aloft his monstrously deformed child, begs him to take them back to Europe, to which the worker agrees.

The worker and farmer bring the crowd to the docks, where there are hundreds of ships once owned by European powers, now suited only for river traffic. Nevertheless, the crowd boards, and a hundred ships soon leave for Europe; conditions on board are cramped, unsanitary and miserable, with many passengers including children publicly fornicating. As the ships pass "the straits of Ceylon", helicopters swarm overhead, capturing images of the migrants on board to be published in Europe. Meanwhile, on the Russian Far East, the Soviet troops see masses of Chinese ready to enter Siberia but are reluctant to fight them.

As the fleet crosses the Indian Ocean, the political situation in France becomes more charged. At a press conference about the crisis, a French official who offers a speech in praise of the migrants is confronted by a journalist who claims he is merely trying to "feed the invaders" and demands to know if France will "have the courage to stand up to" the migrants when they reach France. The official decries this question as morally offensive and threatens to throw the journalist out when he continues to yell. Other journalists seek to inflame tensions between the French and Africans and Arabs already living in the country. Over time, these journalists begin to write that the migrant fleet is on a mission to "enrich, cleanse and redeem the Capitalist West". At the same time as the fleet is praised by those in Paris, the people of Southern France, terrified of the migrants' arrival, flee to the north.

As the fleet approaches the Suez Canal, Egyptian military forces fire a warning shot, causing the fleet to steer south, around the Cape of Good Hope. To the surprise of observers, the apartheid regime of South Africa floats out barges of food and supplies, which the migrants throw overboard. The international press is thrilled, believing the rejection of these supplies to be a political statement against the apartheid South African regime. Western leaders, confident the migrants will accept supplies from their "more virtuous" nations, organize a supply mission, funded by governments, charities, rock stars and major churches, to meet the migrants off São Tomé. However, the fleet does not stop for these barges either, and when a worker from the Pope's barge attempts to board one of the ships, he is strangled and thrown overboard. The press attempts to contain coverage of the murder.

When the migrants pass through the Strait of Gibraltar, the French president orders troops to the south and addresses the nation with his plan to repel them. However, in the middle of the address, he breaks down, demanding the troops simply follow their consciences instead. Most of the troops immediately desert their posts and join the civilians as they flee north, and the south is quickly overrun by the migrants. Some of the last troops to stand their ground take refuge in a small village, along with Calguès, an old man who has chosen to remain at his home, and Hamadura, a Westernized Indian who is terrified of his "filthy, brutish" countrymen and prides himself on having more in common with whites than Indians. The troops in this village, a total of nineteen Frenchmen and one Indian, surrounded by what they deem "occupied territory", remain the last defense of Western values and "Free France" against the immigrants."

Excerpt of "The Camp of the Saints"

Germany: Migrants 'may have fuelled violent crime rise'

  

Many migrants who arrive in Germany are young single men separated from their families. Migrants may be responsible for most of a recent rise in violent crime in Germany, research commissioned by the government suggests.

The study used data from Lower Saxony, a state where more than 90% of the rise was attributed to young male migrants. The researchers say the findings are not surprising because many migrants who arrived in Germany in recent years are single males aged 14-30.

This group is most likely to commit crime, irrespective of nationality. The researchers also said that migrants were twice as likely to be reported to police for alleged violent crimes as German nationals.

The report comes as Chancellor Angela Merkel's centre-right CDU/CSU prepares for coalition talks with the centre-left SPD. Both groups were seen as being hurt by their apparently liberal migration policies in September's election.

The report used statistics from Lower Saxony - regarded as an average state - where police saw an increase of 10.4% in reported violent crimes in 2015 and 2016.

Based on figures from the state's interior ministry, which keeps a separate record of alleged crimes by migrants, the report suggested that 92.1% of this increase was attributable to migrants.

Lower Saxony has seen a significant increase in arrivals of migrants in recent years.

However, the researchers also said that a third of all victims of violent crimes by migrants were other migrants. What conclusions did the report reach?

The researchers said that the best chance of reducing violent crime among migrants was to offer more help with integration through language courses, sport and apprenticeships.

But it said that many male migrants fell into the 14-30 age category, the most likely to commit violent crime.

The lack of women and families among the migrants also meant that those young men were deprived of a "violence-preventing, civilising force", the study said. The report suggested more migrants should be reunited with their families

It also said that migrants with little hope of being giving asylum in Germany were much more likely to commit violent crime than those from war zones like Syria whose asylum was guaranteed.

"Anyone who as a war refugee regards their chances of staying in Germany as good, will endeavour not to jeopardise those prospects by criminal offences," the authors of the study said, quoted by Die Welt newspaper.

Reuters news agency quoted criminology expert and study author Christian Pfeiffer as saying: "The situation is completely different for those who find out as soon as they arrive that they are totally undesirable here. No chance of working, of staying here."

In the Lower Saxony figures, 17% of crimes attributed to migrants were suspected of being committed by North Africans. This group, which makes up less than 1% of the state's migrant population, has little chance of achieving legal status in Germany.

Why is this a hot topic in Germany?

Since 2015, more than one million migrants and refugees, many of whom had fled war and abuses in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, have entered Germany in response to Chancellor Merkel's open-door policy.

But the policy has led to tensions at home.

Sex attacks on women on New Year's eve 2015 in Cologne and other German cities, which victims say were carried out by men of North African and Arab appearance, fuelled the rise of groups such as the anti-immigrant Pegida movement.

Mrs Merkel's conservatives suffered their worst poll result in almost 70 years in September's elections as they lost ground to the right-wing nationalist AfD,

Her coalition partners the SPD also had their worst result since 1949.

The migration issue is expected to remain a major headache for both sides as they try to form a new coalition 

3 January 2018
Reuters Migrants in Berlin - 2015 

The great invasion of Europe

 

The suicidal europeans

 

The Camp of the Saints (excerpt)

 

"The immigrants make their way north, having no desire to assimilate to French culture, but continuing to demand a First World standard of living, even as they flout laws, do not produce, and murder French citizens, such as factory bosses and shopkeepers, as well as the ordinary people who do not welcome them. They are also joined by the immigrants who already reside in Europe, as well as various left-wing and anarchist groups. 

Across the West, more and more migrants arrive and have children, rapidly growing to outnumber whites. In a matter of months, the white West has been overrun and pro-immigrant governments have been established, while the white people are ordered to share their houses and flats with the immigrants. The village containing the troops is bombed flat by airplanes of the new French government, referred to only as the "Paris Multiracial Commune". 

Within a few years, most Western governments have surrendered. The mayor of New York City is made to share Gracie Mansion with three African-American families from Harlem; migrants gather at coastal ports in West Africa and South Asia and swarm into Europe, Australia, and New Zealand; London is taken over by an organization of non-white residents known as the "Non-European Commonwealth Committee", who force the British queen to have her son marry a Pakistani woman; millions of black Africans from around the continent gather at the Limpopo River and invade South Africa; and only one drunken Soviet soldier stands in the way of hundreds of thousands of Chinese peasants as they overrun Siberia." 

by Jean Raspail 

Se não dá, como é que dá?

 

Um texto do Expresso desta semana, assinado por Ana Baptista, começa por destacar o chamado “caso humano”. Trata-se de um artigo sobre o estudo “Acessibilidade à Habitação em Portugal”, apresentado na conferência “Observatório do Imobiliário”. O tal “caso humano” com que a autora abre a sua peça é-nos apresentado como sendo “um motorista de Uber – um paquistanês a viver em Lisboa com as suas duas mulheres e seis filhos”. Dissertando sobre o problema da habitação em Portugal, o paquistanês refere que “Portugal é todo ele bonito. O país muito bonito. Mas tem um problema. É o dinheiro. O salário mínimo são € 920 e a renda – para uma casa pequena – é mais de € 600. Não dá”, conclui o motorista da Uber.

O retrato traçado não surpreende ninguém. A crise na habitação bate à porta de todos os portugueses, especialmente dos jovens e o “não dá” é a frase mais comum entre eles, quando fazem as contas à compra ou arrendamento de uma habitação. A conclusão do discurso deste “caso humano” é que é espantosa: O imigrante paquistanês diz textualmente, que “não dá” para arranjar uma casa em Lisboa, quando o ordenado mínimo é de €920 e não há rendas abaixo de €600. Ora, partindo do princípio de que o motorista da Uber estava a contar a verdade, há aqui lugar para uma pergunta: Se não dá para arranjar casa em Lisboa, com o seu ordenado, como é que dá para arranjar casa em Lisboa onde viva “com as suas duas mulheres e seis filhos”? Afinal dá ou não dá?

Embora esteja fora do âmbito do artigo do Expresso, que versa sobre os problemas da habitação em Portugal, vem a talhe de foice perguntar como é que o paquistanês motorista de Uber consegue alimentar nove bocas por mês – ele próprio, as duas mulheres e os seus seis filhos - com o escasso salário mínimo de €920? Os portugueses que têm a sorte de conseguir uma habitação optam, na maioria dos casos, por terem apenas um filho. E nesta decisão pesa bastante o custo financeiro de mais uma criança. Daí a diminuição da população portuguesa não-imigrante, colocando em risco a renovação demográfica e a chamada “Grande Substituição” que levou países como a Suécia a terem uma percentagem de 30% de imigrantes (e o 2ºlugar em matéria de homicídios, em toda a Europa). Mas alimentar duas mulheres e seis filhos parece não constituir problema para este motorista da Uber. Talvez tenha a ver com a generosidade das gorjetas dos turistas...

 

Voltando à questão da carência de oferta do parque habitacional português, será que já está em prática a política de “imigrantes primeiro”, defendida pelo director científico do Observatório das Migrações, Pedro Góis? Numa entrevista à Rádio Renascença, este responsável político afirmou que “em relação ao tipo de apoio a conceder aos imigrantes (...) deveria ser dada prioridade a esses mesmo imigrantes, na obtenção de habitação”. O director científico do Observatório das Migrações alegou ainda que "(...) enquanto que a população nacional pode permanecer em casa dos pais mais alguns anos, quem chega necessita de um espaço para habitar (...)", como fundamento para conceder essa prioridade aos imigrantes.

Entre 2020 e 2024, o número de imigrantes em Portugal passou de 666 mil para 1,546 milhões - um aumento de 43%. Para alojar esses 1,546 milhões, a um "ratio" de 20 pessoas por casa, terão sido necessárias, no mínimo, 73 mil habitações. A média nacional (oficial...) de residentes por habitação é de 2,5 pessoas. Se estes números fossem aplicados aos 1,5 milhões de imigrantes, seriam necessárias 618 mil habitações. Mesmo assim, é estranho que se tenham encontrado, em poucos anos, 73 mil habitações disponíveis, para arrendar a grupos de 20 imigrantes, cada uma. Com o reagrupamento familiar, que poderá trazer mais 3 milhões de imigrantes, no total, serão necessárias mais 150 mil habitações, mantendo-se o mesmo "ratio" de 20 residentes por habitação.

Mas o motorista paquistanês parece ter encontrado a fórmula mágica que tantos portugueses procuram, sem sucesso. Faz parte do número de felizardos que conseguiu o reagrupamento familiar. Como fez para trazer duas mulheres “oficiais” é um dos muitos mistérios do negócio da imigração em Portugal. O crime de bigamia está previsto no artigo 247.º do Código Penal. Segundo este artigo, comete o crime de bigamia quem, sendo casado, contrair outro casamento. A punição para este crime é uma pena de prisão que pode ir até dois anos

E a avaliar pela legislação referente ao reagrupamento familiar, parece-nos duvidoso que o condutor paquistanês da Uber ganhe assim tão pouco que roçará o ordenado mínimo nacional. Com efeito, a lei sobre reagrupamento familiar obriga a um conjunto de requisitos, alguns deles financeiros.

Para que o pedido de reagrupamento seja aceite, o imigrante já residente em Portugal e com a sua situação regularizada deve cumprir as seguintes condições (entre outras), de acordo com a lei:

Alojamento adequado: O requerente deve dispor de alojamento adequado para si e para os seus familiares. Terá de apresentar comprovativo da sua morada de residência (contrato de arrendamento, certidão de registo predial, ou declaração do senhorio/entidade alojadora).

Meios de Subsistência Suficientes: O requerente deve ter meios de subsistência estáveis e regulares, que sejam suficientes para si e para os seus familiares, sem que estes necessitem de recorrer ao sistema de assistência social.

Os valores de referência são calculados com base no Salário Mínimo Nacional (SMN): 

Em 2025, com um SMN de 870€:
Para o primeiro adulto reagrupado: 50% do SMN (435€)
Para cada adulto adicional: 50% do SMN (435€)
Para cada menor de 18 anos: 30% do SMN (261€)

Estes valores são adicionados ao SMN do requerente. Por exemplo, se o requerente ganha um SMN (870€) e quer reagrupar o cônjuge, precisaria de demonstrar meios de subsistência de 870€ + 435€ = 1305€. O comprovativo deve ser para um período não inferior a 12 meses.

Ora perto de 90% dos trabalhadores estrangeiros em Portugal ganhavam até €1.000 brutos em 2024, informação baseada em dados oficiais do Ministério do Trabalho, Solidariedade e Segurança Social . De acordo com a notícia publicada no Executive Digest (e replicada por outras fontes), os dados do Ministério mostram que, em 2024, cerca de 87% dos empregos ocupados por cidadãos estrangeiros (aproximadamente 1,2 milhões de vínculos laborais) tinham uma remuneração bruta até mil euros. 

Quanto aos portugueses não-imigrantes, 50% deles ganham ordenados medianos de uma média mensal aproximada de 889,92€ (valores de 2022). Se a larga maioria dos imigrantes auferia apenas um salário bruto de 1.000 euros, em 2024), como é que centenas de milhar deles conseguem obter um rendimento líquido de 1.300 euros, para cumprir a lei do reagrupamento familiar?

Monarchy by Seneca III (From "Gates of Vienna")

 

The ongoing matter of King Charles III and his failure to comprehensively deal with his pervert brother, Andrew Mountanything Windsor, is a matter of some concern, but there is another matter of far greater significance waiting in the wings to be attended to.

When I was commissioned, I swore an oath of loyalty to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. The final sentence concluded with: “…and to my Heirs and Successors.” I have struggled with that ever since KC III, Head of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith, announced that he would be Defender of all the Faiths, including, of course, that faith of our Muslim enemies within.

Later in his bumbling reign the final straw for me was when he sublet the ancient, sacred St. George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle to a bunch of headbangers for them to celebrate their ideological conquest of the United Kingdom, an act of spiritual high treason that can only be rectified by a complete sterilisation, fumigation and a reconsecration of the chapel and his quiet abdication and retirement talking to his plants, followed by the enthroning of King William IV.